TABLE 3-15 COMPLETED PROJECTS: EX SITU PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR GROUND WATER, SURFACE WATER, AND LEACHATE



Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
EPA Demo
National Lead Industry, NJ
10/93
Carolyn Esposito
(908) 906-6895
Gary Vaccaro,
SAIC (201)489-5200
FORAGER® sponge Waters Heavy metals
90% removal

Sponge can scavenge metals at ppm or ppb in industrial discharges

1 bed volume/minute control pH, temp, total ionic content Open-celled cellulose sponge Regeneration or incineration of the metals-saturated sponge In situ directly inserted into well or ex situ. Sponge can scavenge metals in concentrated levels of ppm and ppb from industrial discharges. $340 per 1000 gallons
Pease Air Force Base, Newington, NH

Ronald Turner (513) 569-7775

Adsorption (Ambersorb® 563 adsorbent) Ground water Vinyl Chloride, 1,1-Dichloro- ethene, Trichloroethene     Condensed con taminants are recovered through phase separation Ambersorb 563 adsorbent has 5 to 10 times the capa city of granular activated carbon (GAC) for low concentrations of volatile organic com-pounds (VOC).
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Superfund Site: Western Processing, WA (near Seattle)

Mark Benjamin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, (206) 543-7645

Adsorption (Adsorptive Filtration) Ground water Soluble and particulate Zinc       Adsorptive filtration removes inorganic contaminants (metals) from aqueous waste streams.
Superfund Site: The Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Operable Unit 17, Comerse City, CO Sequence of unit processes uncluding precipitation, filtration, UV/chemical oxidation, GAC, air stripping and Adsorption (Activated Alumina) Wastewater VOCs: benzene, toluene, TCE, PCE;
Metals: arsenic, chromium, lead.
    Discharge of treated effluent to the sanitary sewer and offsite disposal of sludge and residuals. Treatment goals meet Colorado Basic Standards for Ground Water (CBSG) and the state MCLS.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Superfund Site: Valley Wood Preserving, Inc., Turlock, CA Excavation and cement-based fixation for contaminated soil.
Chemical treatment followed by
Adsorption (Activated Alumina)
Soil and ground water Chromium and arsenic.     Backfilling excavated area with treated soil.
Treated water is reinjected to ground water and/or discharged to percolation ponds.
Total estimated cost for this remedial action is $3,850,000 with annual O&M cost of $224,000.
Superfund Site: Motor Wheel, Lansing TWP, MI Backfilling, capping, and slurry wall containment for contaminated soil.
Aeration, separation, air stripping, and
Adsorption (Activated Alumina) for ground water.
Soil and groundwater VOCs: benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes;
Organics: PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides;
Metals: arsenic, chromium, and lead
      Activated alumina adsorption process removes fluoride from ground water.
Superfund Site: Perham Arsenic, Perham, MN Filtration and Adsorption (Activated Alumina) for ground water on site Ground water Arsenic cleanup goal of 50 ppb from up to 1260 ppb in plume.     Discharge of treated effluent to the aquifer;
Disposal of alumina filter media and filtered solids
The overall Present Worth costs are $2,548,776, with the annual O&M costs of $217,806 (year 1 to 6)
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Englin AFB

Edward G. Marchand
HQ AFCESA/RAVW
Tyndall AFB,FL (904) 283-6023

Rotary air Stripper- high iron content Soil & Ground water >99% removal        
DOE Demo- Savannah River Site, SC

G.E. Turner, DOE Savannah R. Oper. Office Env. Rest, Aiken, SC

Full-scale pump and treat using aboveground air stripping. Ground water Influent concentrations: up to 48 ppm for TCE, up to 12 ppm for PCE. Average VOC removal efficiencies in air stripper: >99.9% In Situ 7 horizontal wells installed; only 2 wells used in field demonstration   Total Capital Cost: $4,103,000; Total Annual Operating Cost: $149,200.
$0.20/1,000 L ($0.75/1,000 gallons)
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Langley AFB, VA

Vern Bartels
Remedial Project Manager

Vacuum assisted well point extraction system and aboveground air stripping. Goundwater Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons: 25 to 4,100 ppb on ground water, >100 ppm in soil.       Total Capital Cost: $569,739; Annual Operating Cost: $216,561
McClellan AFB, CA

Remedial Project Manager
McClellan AFB

Aboveground air stripping. 660 million gallons of ground water Estimated 33,000 kg of VOCs released. Influent VOC concentration at 60 ppm   7 extraction wells were installed. 2 GAC units in series were used to polish liquid phase after stripping. Effluent below permitted discharge levels. Total Capital Cost; $4,000,000; Total Annual Operating Cost: $1,240,000.
Army Demo
Fort Dix, NJ

Steve Maloney
(217) 373-6740

Catalytic Decontamination and Air stripping Ground water Reduction:
0% TOC
up to 90% VOC
Ex situ Ozone injection and stripping Air stream - treated in catalytic unit and recycled Metal precipitate clogging and biofouling can occur.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Verona Wellfield
Battle Creek, MI
GAC as pretreatment for air stripper. Ground water 12,850 ppb TVOC Attained: 11 ppb        
U.S. Coast Guard
Traverse City, MI
GAC used with Pump/treat Ground water 10,329 ppb of Toluene. Attained: < 10 ppb   Discharge to municipal sewer.    
Love Canal
Niagara Falls, NY
GAC system for leachate treatment. Ground water 28,000 ppb Benzene. Attained: < 10 ppb        
Fort Drum,
Watertown, NY

Remedial Project Manager
Fort Drum Environmental Division

Air Sparging, Dual Phase Extraction and GAC Ground water Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX) Full-scale remediation to recover free-phase petroleum product using ground water extraction and air stripping and GAC 2 recovery wells were installed and 2 GAC drums were used in series.   Total Capital Cost: $958,780; Total annual Operating Cost: $129,440.
Milan AAP
Milan, TN

USAEC ETD
(410) 671-2054

GAC for explosives contaminated ground water. Ground water 1.0 - 2.0 mg/L total explosive. Attained: ND (< 10 ppb) for all explosives        
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Amoco Petroleum Pipeline
Constantine, MI
Air Sparging, Dual Phase Extraction and GAC to recover free product and treat ground water. 775 million gallons of ground water 300,000 to 2 million gallons of gasoline, fuel oil, and kerosene In situ air sparging was subsequently added to treat the saturated zone. 4 extraction wells and 30 air sparging wells were installed. 2 GAC vessels in series 118,000 gallons of free product recovered   Capital Cost: $297,000 for ground water recovery and treatment, $375,000 for air sparging.
Annual Operating Cost: $475,000
$3 per 1,000 gallons of ground water treated.
Commencement Bay South Tacoma Channel,
Tacoma, WA

Kevin Rochlin
Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA

2 liquid-phase GAC 281,700,000 gallons of ground water Specific VOCs at influent: 13 to 2,000 µg/L.
DCE up to 100 ppb, PCA up to 300 ppb, PCE up to 5.4 ppb, TCE up to 130 ppb. Attained: Specific VOCs at effluent: 1 to 13 µg/L.
Full-scale application of ground water extraction followed by GAC treatment in conjunction with an SVE system. 7 ground water extraction wells were installed and 2 liquid-phase GAC containers were operated in parallel.     Total cost: $1,343,701
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
EPA Demo
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., WI

1993

Douglas Grosse
(513) 569-7844

Ion Exchange: Electrochemical reduction & immobilization Ground water Hexavalent chromium and other heavy metals In situ requires excess ferrous ions - maintain pH Electrochemical reactions generate ions for removal of hexavalent chromium Clean water is reinjected into ground Ex situ can be used to maximize rate and removal.
Army Demo
USACE-WES, MS

Mark Bricka
(601) 634-3700

Ion exchange: Xanthate treatment Ground water & wastewater Heavy metals Ion exchange with xanthated material Precipitation, sedimentation, and filtration Concentrated metal sludge Offers many advantages over hydroxide precipitation.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
EPA Demo
Palangana Uranium Mine Site, TX

7/93

Annette Gatchett
(513) 569-7697

Precipitation/ Filtration Ground water Low-moderate levels of NORM (uranium, radium-226, thorium-230) Complexing, adsorption, and absorption URAL complexing agent Treated water to holding pond
 
Coakley Landfill
New Hampshire
Precipitation: Pretreatment of ground water by hydroxide precipitation with lime, Ground water Cr - 330 ppb
Ni - 122-200 ppb
As - 10-90 ppb Attained:
Cr - 50 ppb
Ni - 100 ppb
As - 50 ppb
  Used air stripping for removal of VOCs    
Stringfellow Acid Pit Site California Precipitation. Water Cr - 1.5-270 ppm
Cd - 0.32-9.3 ppm
Zn - 2.2-300 ppm
Cu - 1.7-20 ppm
Attained:
Cr - 0.5 ppm
Cd - 0.11 ppm
Zn - 2.61 ppm
Cu - 2 ppm
Pretreatment for the removal of metals and organics, then POTW      
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Winthrop Landfill
Winthrop, ME
Precipitation Ground water As - 0.1-0.8 ppm
Ni - 0.04 ppm
Zn - 0.2-0.6 ppm
Attained:
As - 0.05 ppm
Ni - 0.04 ppm
Zn - 0.18 ppm
Pilot test of metals from the ground water by precipitation      
EPA Removal Action
Crown Plating, MO

10/1/89 to 12/31/89 (Removal)

Mark Roberts
(913) 236-3881

Dechlorination using the KPEG process/EPA removal contractor Liquid (5 gallons) Criteria:

Dioxin: <1 ppbInput:
Silvex - 10,000 ppm
Dioxin equivalents - 24.18 ppb

Output:
Silvex - 32 ppb
Dioxin equivalents - 0.068 ppb

Batch operation

Retention time - 36 hours (including time of equipment breakdown)

Temperature - 72 °C

pH - 13

Moisture content - 100%

Ground water extraction Built an on-site vacuum for emissions control

Contaminated residual oil incinerated off-site

Three mobile units currently available. Electroplating site.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Wastewater Technology Center

John Martin
U.S. EPA NRMRL (513)569-7676

Separation Ground water VOCs. 99% Removal efficiency        
EPA & DOE Demo
Rocky Flats Facility, CO

7/90

Annette Gatchett
(513) 569-7697

Separation: Filtration Ground water 58-95% removal of uranium "Polishing" filtration process for heavy metals and non-tritium radio-nuclides (NORM, LLRW, TRU). Uranium in ground water influent at filtration system concentration 40-100 mg/L Specific control - water chemistry, water flux, and bed volume Sorption, chemical complexing, and hydroxide precipitation Concentrated waste sludge Capital - $150K

Operation - $0.40 to $0.53/1,000 L $1.50-$2.00/1,000 gallons treated.

Colloid sorption filter for metals and nontritium radionuclides commercial scale SITE demo.

Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
EPA Demo
American Creosote Works, FL
1991

Kim Lisa Kreiton (513)569-7328 EPA RREL
John Martin
(513) 569-7758

Membrane Separation Ground water PAHs, smaller phenolics
Removal:
90% PAH
80% creosote
25-30% smaller phenolics
 
Positive pressure membrane hyperfiltration unit Clean H2O to POTW, concentrated contaminants to holding tanks $228-$1,739/1,000 gallons treated. $500K - $1.2M annual
DOI Demo
Birmingham, AL Manassas, VA

1992

Ronald H. Church
(205) 759-9446

Solid/liquid separation Wastewater Solids and fine particulate matter in mining wastes Feed flow rate in field test unit was 50-175 gpm. Freed material is usually a degradable polyacrylamide Pipe delivery system used as mixing system to minimize quantity of feed used. Waste should be in slurry form The "clean" water can be discharged. Flocculated material becomes solid waste for a landfill Polymer costs are $0.50-0.60 per ton of dry solids produced when polymer is bought in bulk.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
DOI Demo
Bureau of Mines and USAEC (Cooperative effort) Buffalo, NY

Ronald H. Church
(205) 759-9446

Solid/liquid separation Wastewater Suspended particulates from dredging wastes Waste pumped through a 4-inch line to 1,000-gallon fiberglass mixing tank. 6-inch- by-2-inch static mixer. Polymer used for flocculation is pumped through a 1-inch line to the mixing tank. NTU values of the discharge water ranged from 12 to 17, with the underflow discharge containing about 31% solids Polymer costs:
$0.50/lb when bought in bulk. Focus of DOI/USACE test is removal of suspended particulates from dredging of sediments.
EPA SITE Demo
Selma Pressure Treating Selma, CA

11/90

Edward Bates
(513) 569-7774

Pretreatment separation/ Solidification/ Stabilization with silicate compounds Ground water, soil, sludge Organics and inorganics Silicate compounds Pretreatment separation of coarse and fine materials PCP leachate concentrations reduced up to 97%. As, Cr, Cu immobilized Applied to a wide variety of hazardous soils, sludges, and wastewaters.
DOE Integrated Demo,
4 DOE sites:
(1) Hanford
(2) Fernald, ID
(3) Oak Ridge
(4) Savannah River

2/91

Roger Gilchrist
(509) 376-5310

Separation: USTs, emphasizing the single-shell storage tanks located at the Hanford site Ground water, soil Tank waste constituents ranging from Na-nitrates to transuranics, in 3 forms: supernatant (liquid), sludges, and saltcake (which can be as hard as cement) UST-ID is pursuing technologies in two general areas: characterization/ retrieval and separations of low-level waste Parameters vary among technologies Parameters vary among technologies The UST-ID program will be used at Hanford, Fernald, Idaho, Oak Ridge, and Savannah River. Most UST waste was generated by processes used to separate nuclear fuels from other components.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
DOI, Army, EPA Demo
Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility, MI; Toronto, Canada

10/91 to 6/92

S. Jackson Hubbard
(513) 569-7507

Particle Separation Process Sediments (30 yd³ day) PCBs, heavy metals, radionuclides Contaminant and grain size analysis Screening, water and chemicals added, attrition scrubbing, particle separation Output soil, silts, clays, and waste-water Demo was part of the Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCs) Program.
EPA Demo
Palmerton Zinc Superfund Site, PA

1990

John Martin
(513) 569-7758

Membrane microfiltration Liquid wastes Solid particles in liquid wastes-removal averaged 99.95% for Zn & TSS Filter press 45 psi

Shallow aquifer with dissolved heavy metals

Tyvek (T-980) spun-bound olefin filter Filter cake 40-60% solids Best for treating waste less than 5,000 ppm.

$213K - $549K annual

Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, CA

Ronald Turner (513) 569-7775

Separation (Cross-Flow Pervaporation System) Ground water Organics, primarily TCE - 98% reduction TCE influent concentrations - 250 ppm, flow rate - 10 gpm     The ZENON Environmental Inc. cross-flow pervaporation technology is a membrane-based process that removes VOC from aqueous matrices.
Harris County

John Blount (713) 956-3000

Trickling Filter (Sprinkler Irrigation) Wastewater BOD, TSS BOD load rate - 45 lbs./day/1000 sq. ft.. Hydraulic load rate - 235 gallons/day/sq. ft..   Effluents are chlorinated and stored in a pump tank. They are distributed to lawns through an automatic irrigation system.  
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Tracey, CA 1992

National Risk Management Research Laboratory (513) 569-7697

Photochemical Ground water TCE, PCE, DCA        
Lawrence Livermore Site 300, CA 1992

Vulcan Peroxidation Systems, Inc. (602)790-8383 National Risk Management Research Laboratory (513) 569-7697

Chemical Oxidation Ground water VOCs        
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
EPA Demo
Coleman-Evans Site, FL

Norma Lewis
(513) 569-7665

Soil washing/catalytic ozone oxidation Soil, sludge, & ground water Organics - 1-20,000 ppm Soil washing enhanced by ultrasound followed by oxidation Soil particles larger than 1 inch are crushed Carbon filter for off-gas Excalibur technology.
Navy Demo
Bangor SUBASE, WA

Spring 1993

Carmen LeBron
(805) 982-1616

Advanced Oxidation Process. Bench-scale TNT and RDX treatability test. Recirculating UV/ozone reactor. 30-minute retention. Ground water Beginning levels: 7 ppm TNT; 600 ppb RDX
Ordnance - treated to 2.9 ppb TNT and 0.8 ppb RDX
Maintain pH. UV oxidation, H202 to generate hydroxyl radicals Possible toxic byproducts Full scale system being designed.
Navy Demo
U.S. Navy Site, NJ

1991

Andy Law
(805) 982-1650

Advanced Oxidation Process Ground water Organics - TOC 50-100 ppm Maintain pH UV oxidation, H202 to generate hydroxyl radicals Contaminant destruction
 
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
Winthrop Superfund Site, ME

Dr. Raymond Machacek
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
(617) 498-5580

UV/oxidation Ground water Pretreat for iron, then UV/oxidation solvents. 5 ppm DMF. Attained: < 5 ppb        
Milan AAP
Milan, TN

USAEC ETD
(410) 671-2054

UV/oxidation Ground water Explosives: 20.0 ppm total explosives

Attained: ND (10 ppb) for all explosives

       
Air Force & EPA Demo
Edwards AFB, CA

3/93

Richard Eilers
(513) 569-7809

UV/oxidation: CAV-OX® Process Ground water & wastewater Organics - 96-100% reduction H2O2 and metal catalysts added if needed Hydrodynamic cavitation and UV oxidation Contaminant destruction Cannot handle free product or highly turbid streams.
Site Name/
Contact
Technology/
Vendor
Media Treated Contaminants Treated Operating
Parameters
Materials Handling Residuals Management Comments
EPA Demo
Lake Charles Treatment Center, LA

Randy Parker
(513) 569-7271

PO*WW*ERTM evaporation & catalytic oxidation Ground water & wastewaters Volatile & non-volatile organic compounds, salts, metals, volatile inorganics 0.25 gpm pilot-plant Evaporation & oxidation Concentrated contaminant solution disposed of or treated further $110/1,000 gallons treated.
EPA Demo
San Jose, CA

3/89

Norma Lewis
(513) 569-7665

Ultraviolet radiation & oxidation Ground water Halogenated hydrocarbons, VOCs, pesticides, PCBs - 99% TCE, 58% 1,1-DCA, 85% 1,1,1-TCA removal UV,H202 destruction Tank with air compressor, O3 generator, and H202 feed Offgas to ozone destruction 20 commercial systems installed.
DOE Demo
Kansas City Plant, MO

Sidney B. Garland II
(615) 579-8581

Ultraviolet radiation, hydrogen peroxide, and ozone Ground water TCE concentration above 10,000 µg/L in ground water. >99.5% VOCs were destroyed. 30% downtime for maintenance and repair Flow rate has averaged 15% of design rate
 
Total Capital Cost: $1,383,400; Annual Operating Cost: $355,200.

Sources: Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (EPA, Eighth Edition, Nov. 1996). Completed North American Innovative Remediation Technology Demonstration Projects (EPA, Aug.1996)