Matrix
Characteristics |
Measurement
Procedures |
Important to
Document Procedure? |
Potential Effects
or Cost Performance |
Soil Types |
Soil Classification |
Soil classification is a semi-empirical
measurement of sand, silt, clay, gravel, and loam
content. Several soil classification schemes are in use
and include the ASTM Standard D 2488-90, Practice for
Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual
Procedure), and the USDA and CSSC systems. |
Yes |
Soil classification is an important
characteristic for assessing the effect on cost or
performance of all technologies shown on Table D-1. For
example, in soil vapor extraction, sandy soils are
typically more amenable to treatment than clayey soils.
(See related information under clay content and/or
particle size distribution.) |
Clay Content and/or Particle Size
Distribution |
Clay content and/or particle size
distribution is measured using a variety of soil
classification systems, including ASTM D 2488-90 under
soil classification. |
Yes |
Clay and particle size distribution
affect air and fluid flow through contaminated media. In
slurry phase bioremediation systems, particle size
affects ability to hold media in suspension. In soil
washing, the particle size/contaminant concentration
relationship affects potential for physical separation
and volume reduction. For thermal desorption systems,
clay and particle size affects mass and heat transfer,
including agglomeration and carryover to air pollution
control devices. |
Matrix
Characteristics |
Measurement
Procedures |
Important to
Document Procedue? |
Potential Effects
or Cost Performance |
Aggregate Soil
Properties |
Hydraulic Conductivity /Water
Permeability |
Hydraulic conductivity/water
permeability can be determined through several
procedures. Hydraulic conductivity, which is a measure of
the ease of water flow through soil, is typically
calculated as a function of permeability or
transmissivity. ASTM D 5126-90, Guide for Comparison of
Field Methods for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity in
the Vadose Zone, is a guide for determining hydraulic
conductivity. Water permeability is often calculated by
pumping out ground water, measuring ground water
draw-down rates and recharge times through surrounding
monitoring wells, and factoring in the distance between
the wells and the pump. Method 9100 in EPA SW-846 is used
to measure permeability, as well as several ASTM
standards: D 2434-68 (1974), Test Method for Permeability
of Granular Soils (Constant Head); D 4630-86, Test Method
for Determining Transmissivity and Storativity of Low
Permeability Rocks by In Situ Measurements Using the
Constant Head Injection Test; and D 4631-86, Test Method
for Determining Transmissivity and Storativity of Low
Permeability Rocks by In Situ Measurements Using the
Pressure Pulse Technique. |
Yes |
This characteristic is important in
ground water remediation technologies including in situ
ground water bioremediation, ground water sparging, and
pump and treat systems. Hydraulic conductivity and water
permeability affect the zone of influence of the
extraction wells and, therefore, affect the number of
wells needed for the remediation effort and the cost of
operating the extraction wells. |
Moisture Content |
Procedures for measuring soil moisture
content are relatively standardized. Soil moisture
content is typically measured using a gravimetric ASTM
standard, D 2216-90, Test Method for Laboratory
Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and
Rock. |
No |
The moisture content of the matrix
typically affects the performance, both directly and
indirectly, of technologies including soil vapor
extraction, and ex situ technologies such as
stabilization, incineration, and thermal desorption. For
example, air flow rates during operation of soil vapor
extraction technologies are affected by moisture content
of the soil. Thermal input requirements and air handling
systems for incineration and desorption technologies can
also be affected by soil moisture content. (Effects of
moisture content on operation of technologies are
discussed in Table D-4). |
Air Permeability |
Air permeability is a measure of the
ease of air flow through soil and is a calculated value.
For example, air permeability may be calculated by
applying a vacuum to soil with a pump, measuring vacuum
pressures in surrounding monitoring wells, and fitting
the results to a correlation derived by Johnson et al.,
1990. |
Yes |
This characteristic is important for in
situ soil remediation technologies that involve venting
or extraction. Air permeability affects the zone of
influence of the extraction wells, and, therefore,
affects the number of extraction wells needed for the
remediation effort and the cost of operating the
extraction wells. |
pH |
pH is a measure of the degree of acidity
or alkalinity of a matrix. Procedures for measuring and
reporting pH are standardized and include EPA SW-846
Method 9045 and ASTM methods for soil (ASTM D 4972-89,
Test Method for pH of Soils) and ground water (ASTM D
1293-84). |
No |
The pH of the matrix can impact the
solubility of contaminants and biological activity.
Therefore, this characteristic can affect technologies
such as soil bioventing, soil flushing, land treatment
and composting and in situ ground water bioremediation.
pH can also affect the operation of treatment
technologies (see Table D-4). pH in the corrosive range
(e.g., <2 and >12) can damage equipment and
typically requires use of personal protection equipment
and other special handling procedures. |
Porosity |
Porosity is the volume of air- or
water-filled voids in a mass of soil. Procedures for
measuring and reporting porosity are standardized.
Porosity is measured by ASTM D 4404-84, Test Method for
Determination of the Pore Volume and Pore Volume
Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion
Porosimetry |
No |
This characteristic is important for in
situ technologies, such as soil bioventing, soil vapor
extraction, and ground water sparging, that rely upon use
of a driving force for transferring contaminants into an
aqueous or air-filled space. Porosity affects the driving
force and thus the performance that may be achieved by
these technologies. |
Transmissivity |
Transmissivity, the flow from a
saturated aquifer, is the product of hydraulic
conductivity and aquifer thickness. |
No - The measurement of hydraulic
conductivity is important to document, because
transmissivity is a product of hydraulic conductivity and
aquifer thickness, it would not be necessary to document
the measurement procedure for this characteristic. |
This characteristic is important for
ground water pump and treat systems. Transmissivity
affects the zone of influence in this type of
remediation, which impacts the number of wells and the
cost of operating the wells. |
Matrix
Characteristics |
Measurement
Procedures |
Important to
Document Procedue? |
Potential Effects
or Cost Performance |
Organics |
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) |
TOC is a measure of the total organic
carbon content of a matrix. Measurement of TOC is
standardized (e.g., Method 9060 in EPA SW-846) |
No |
TOC affects the desorption of
contaminants from soil and impacts in situ soil
remediation, soil washing, and in situ ground water
bioremediation. |
Oil & Grease (O&G) or Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) |
Procedures for measuring O&G and TPH
are standardized. O&G is measured using Method 9070
in EPA SW-846, and TPH is measured using Method 9073. A
TPH analysis is similar to an O&G analysis with an
additional extraction step. TPH does not include
nonpetroleum fractions, such as animal fats and humic and
fulvic acids. |
No |
O&G and TPH affect the desorption of
contaminants from soil. For thermal desorption, elevated
levels of TPH may result in agglomeration of soil
particles, resulting in longer residence times. |
Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (NAPLs) |
There is no standard measurement method
for determining the presence of NAPLs; rather, their
presence is determined by examining ground water and
identifying a separate phase. The presence of NAPLs is
reported as either being present or not present. |
Yes |
NAPLs may be a continuing source of
contaminants for in situ technologies. NAPLs may lead to
increased contaminant loads and thus to greater costs or
longer operating periods for achieving cleanup goals. |