Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix, Version 4.0 4.50 Separation
(Ex Situ GW Remediation Technology)
  Description Synonyms Applicability Limitations Site Information Points of Contact
Data Needs Performance Cost References Vendor Info. Health & Safety
Table of Contents
Technology>>Ground Water, Surface Water, and Leachate

>>3.12 Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (assuming pumping)

      >>4.50 Separation
Introduction>> Separation techniques concentrate contaminated waste water through physical and chemical means.


Figure 4-50a Typical Distillation System

Figure 4-50b Typical Filtration System

Figure 4-50c: Typical Freeze Crystallization System

Figure 4-50d Typical Membrane Pervaporation/Reverse Osmosis System  

Separation processes seek to detach contaminants from their medium (i.e., ground water and/or binding material that contain them). Ex situ separation of waste stream can be performed by many processes: (1) distillation, (2) filtration/ultrafiltration/microfiltration, (3) freeze crystallization, (4) membrane pervaporation and (5) reverse osmosis.


Distillation is a chemical separations process involving vaporization and condensation that is used to separate components of varying vapor pressures (volatilities) in a liquid or gas stream. Simple distillation involves a single stage operation in which heat is applied to a liquid mixture in a still, causing a portion of the liquid to vaporize. These vapors are subsequently cooled and condensed producing a liquid product called distillate or overhead product. The distillate is enriched with the higher volatility components. Conversely, the mixture remaining in the still is enriched with the less volatile components. This mixture is called the bottoms product. Multiple staging is utilized in most commercial distillation operations to obtain better separation of organic components than is possible in a single evaporation and condensation stage.


Filtration is the physical process of mechanical separation based on particle size whereby particles suspended in a fluid are separated by forcing the fluid through a porous medium. As fluid passes through the medium, the suspended particles are trapped on the surface of the medium and/or within the body of the medium. Ultrafiltration/ microfiltration occurs when particles are separated by forcing fluid through a semipermeable membrane. Only the particles whose size are smaller than the openings of the membrane are allowed to flow through.

Freeze Crystallization

Freeze crystallization processes removes purified solvent from solution as frozen crystals. When a solution containing dissolved contaminants is slowly frozen, water ice crystals form on the surface, and the contaminants are concentrated in the remaining solution (called "mother liquor"). The ice crystals can be separated from the mother liquor, washed and melted to yield a nearly pure water stream. The contaminated waste stream, mother liquor, and any precipitated solids, are generally more amenable to subsequent treatment by conventional destruction and stabilization technologies due to the higher concentrations.

Membrane Pervaporation

Membrane pervaporation is a process that uses permeable membranes that preferentially adsorb volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from contaminated water. Contaminated water first passes through a heat exchanger, raising the water temperature. The heated water then enters the pervaporation module, containing membranes composed of a nonporous organophilic polymer, similar to silicone rubber, formed into capillary fibers. VOCs diffuse by vacuum from the membrane-water interface through the membrane wall. Treated water exits the pervaporation module, while the organic vapors travel from the module to a condenser where they return to the liquid phase. The condensed organic materials represent only a fraction of the initial wastewater volume and may be subsequently disposed of at a cost savings.

Reverse Osmosis

The membrane pervaporation process can be modified by using reverse osmosis. In reverse osmosis water is forced through the pervaporation module under pressure. The module containing the membrane(s), of which there are many types depending on the application, allows water free of contaminants to pass through. The water containing the contaminants that were not able to pass through the membrane is recirculated back to the pervaporation module for further treatment, where the organic vapors (called permeate) are extracted by vacuum, condensed and vented downstream of the condenser, thus minimizing air releases.

back to top



back to top


The ex situ separation process is used mainly as a pretreatment or post-treatment process to remove contaminants from waste water. It can be applied to aqueous waste streams such as ground water, lagoons, leachate, and rinse water. Industrial waste streams may also be treated with these processes. The target contaminant groups for ex situ separation processes are VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, and suspended particles. Solvents may be recovered for reuse.

back to top


Factors that may limit the applicability and effectiveness of these processes include:
  • Membrane pervaporation and freeze crystallization are limited to only aqueous waste streams.
  • The presence of oil and grease contaminants may interfere with these processes by decreasing flow rate.
  • Space must be adequate for distillation and freeze crystallization treatment systems. Distillation units are comparatively tall and can cover large areas.
  • Compounds that decompose or polymerize at the operating temperature and are explosive are not desirable in distillation.
  • In freeze crystallization, eutectic mixtures form as solutions become more concentrated; feed stream must be dilute enough to accomplish significant volume reduction before a eutectic mixture forms.

back to top

Data Needs:

A detailed discussion of data elements is provided in Subsection 2.2.2 (Data Requirements for Ground Water, Surface Water, and Leachate).

back to top

Performance Data:

Performance data on distillation and freeze crystillation are not available.

A pilot-plant was evaluated using membrane pervaporation at Wastewater Technology Centre (WTC) by ZENON Environmental Inc. and field tested in 1992. The technology had a removal efficiency of 99 percent. A cost comparison performed in 1992 by WTC and ZENON showed that pervaporation can be competitive with air stripping and activated carbon to treat low VOC concentrations.

back to top


Typical costs for filtration range from $0.36 to $1.20 per 1,000 liters ($1.38 to $4.56 per 1,000 gallons) treated. The cost of freezed crystallization is estimated to be only $0.03 per gallon for a 40 gpm facility.

Additional cost information can be found in the Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Wastes (HTRW) Historical Cost Analysis System (HCAS) developed by Environmental Historical Cost Committee of Interagency Cost Estimation Group.

back to top


Innovative Remediation Technologies:  Field Scale Demonstration Project in North America, 2nd Edition

Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies, Volume 4, June 2000, EPA 542-R-00-006

Guide to Documenting and Managing Cost and Performance Information for Remediation Projects - Revised Version, October, 1998, EPA 542-B-98-007

Battelle Memorial Institute, 1995. "ReOpt. V3.1", by Battelle Memorial Institute for DOE under Contract DE/AC06/76RLO 1830.

Canning, P. and Chris L., 1995. "Cross-flow Pervaporation System", Zenon Environmental Inc.

EPA, 1990. Dupont/Oberlin Microfiltration System, series includes Technology Evaluation, EPA/540/5-90/007, PB92-153410; Applications Analysis, EPA/ 540/A5-90/007; Technology Demonstration Summary, EPA/540/S5-90/007; and Demonstration Bulletin, EPA/540/M5-90/007.

EPA, 1990. Innovative and Alternative Technology Assessment Manual, EPA, Office of Water Program Operations, EPA/430/9-78/009.

EPA, 1992. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Chemical Treatment and Ultrafiltration, Emerging Technology Bulletin, EPA/540/F-92/002.

EPA, 1992. SBP Technologies-Membrane Filtration, Demonstration Bulletin, EPA/540/MR-92/014; and Applications Analysis, EPA/540/AR-92/014.

EPA, 1993. Microfiltration Technology EPOC Water, Inc., Demonstration Bulletin, EPA/540/MR-93/513.

Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, 1998. Remediation Case Studies: Innovative Groundwater Treatment Technologies, EPA/542/R-98/015.

Turner, R., 1995. "Update on Zenon Pervaporation", Ground Water Currents, Issue No.13.

back to top

Site Information:

back to top

Points of Contact:

General FRTR Agency Contacts

Technology Specific Web Sites:

Government Web Sites

Non Government Web Sites

back to top

Vendor Information:

A list of vendors offering Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Water Treatment is available from  EPA REACH IT which combines information from three established EPA databases, the Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT), the Vendor Field Analytical and Characterization Technologies System (Vendor FACTS), and the Innovative Treatment Technologies (ITT), to give users access to comprehensive information about treatment and characterization technologies and their applications.

Government Disclaimer

back to top

Health and Safety:

Hazard Analysis

back to top

Introduction Contaminants Treatments/Profiles References Appendices Navigation