As of July 2020, the content of this old version has been replaced with a new version. |
Description | Synonyms | Applicability | Limitations | Site Information | Points of Contact | |
Data Needs | Performance | Cost | References | Vendor Info. | Health & Safety |
|
|
Description: Figure 4-3:Typical In Situ Phytoremediation System Phytoremediation is a process that uses plants to remove, transfer, stabilize, and destroy contaminants in soil and sediment. The mechanisms of phytoremediation include enhanced rhizosphere biodegradation, phyto-extraction (also called phyto-accumulation), phyto-degradation, and phyto-stabilization. Enhanced Rhizosphere Biodegradation Enhanced rhizosphere biodegradation takes place in the soil immediately surrounding
plant roots. Natural substances released by plant roots supply nutrients to
microorganisms, which enhances their biological activities. Plant roots also loosen the
soil and then die, leaving paths for transport of water and aeration. This process tends
to pull water to the surface zone and dry the lower saturated zones. Phyto-accumulation Phyto-accumulation is the uptake of contaminants by plant roots and the translocation/accumulation (phytoextraction) of contaminants into plant shoots and leaves. Phyto-degradation Phyto-degradation is the metabolism of contaminants within plant tissues. Plants produce enzymes, such as dehalogenase and oxygenase, that help catalyze degradation. Investigations are proceeding to determine if both aromatic and chlorinated aliphatic compounds are amenable to phyto-degradation. Phyto-stabilization Phyto-stabilization is the phenomenon of production of chemical compounds by plant to immobilize contaminants at the interface of roots and soil. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synonyms: Vegetation-enhanced bioremediation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applicability: Phytoremediation may be applicable for the remediation of metals, pesticides, solvents, explosives, crude oil, PAHs, and landfill leachates.Some plant species have the ability to store metals in their roots. They can be transplanted to sites to filter metals from wastewater. As the roots become saturated with metal contaminants, they can be harvested. Hyper-accumulator plants may be able to remove and store significant amount of metallic contaminants. Currently, trees are under investigation to determine their ability to remove organic contaminants from ground water, translocate and transpiration, and possibly metabolize them either to CO2 or plant tissue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limitations: Limitations to phytoremediation in soil include:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Needs: A detailed discussion of these data elements is provided in Subsection 2.2.1 (Data Requirements for Soil, Sediment, and Sludge). In addition, detailed information is needed to determine the kinds of soil used for phytoremediation projects. Water movement, reductive oxygen concentrations, root growth, and root structure all affect the growth of plants and should be considered when implementing phytoremediation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Data: Currently, the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program is attempting to demonstrate and evaluate the efficacy and cost of phytoremediation in the field at sites in Oregon, Utah, Texas, and Ohio.USAEC is also leading the team of experts from EPA, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Waterways Experimental Station (WES) to successfully demonstrate phytoremediation of explosive contaminated sites in Milan Army Ammunition Plant in Milan, TN. AFCEE is currently conducting several phytoremediation demonstrations, including the following: A "mature tree" study has been completed at Cape Canaveral Air Station. Live Oak, Saw-tooth Palmetto and Scrub Oak species in the midst of a TCE plume were evaluated for TCE transpiration and TCE transformation rates. Evapotranspiration rates were also measured. Mature trees were used in this study to obviate the waiting period for whips to grow into mature trees. An initial planting of 110 trees in 1998 was followed by 200 (early 2000) and 150 (spring 2000) additional trees at Travis AFB, CA. The plantings are being used as hydraulic control for a TCE plume. This is a long-term test of the ability of trees to control the movement of groundwater. A similar study is taking place at Altus AFB, OK. One hundred ten non seed-bearing hybrid cottonwood trees were planted in the fall of 1998. The plantings are being used as hydraulic control for a TCE plume. Soil moisture, groundwater levels, climatic conditions and sap flow rates are monitored remotely in this demonstration. A report on the results of the study will be released in the summer 2001. A new effort was launched in the summer 2000, with five large-scale
plantings planned for Fairchild, Offutt, Hill and Whiteman AFBs. Plantings
should be complete by early 2001. More information can also be
located at http://www.afcee.brooks.af.mil/er/ert/phytorem.htm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost: The key cost driver information and cost analysis was developed in 2006 using the Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements (RACER) software. Key Cost Drivers · Scale of effort o Area of contamination is the primary cost driver · Density of sampling o Primary cost driver of sampling cost; may be directed by regulatory requirements. Cost Analysis The following table represents estimated costs (by common unit of measure) to apply phytoremediation technology at sites of varying size and complexity. A more detailed cost estimate table which includes specific site characteristics and significant cost elements that contributed to the final costs can be viewed by clicking on the link below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References: AFCEE, "An overview of Phytoremediation, including installation protocols", provided by the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE).Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (ASR), Tenth Edition, EPA 542-R-01-004 Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field Scale Demonstration Project in North America, 2nd Edition Treatment
Experiences at RCRA Corrective Actions, December 2000, EPA 542-F-00-020 EPA, 1998. A Citizen's Guide to Phytoremediation, Technology Fact Sheet, EPA NCEPI, EPA/542/F-98/011. EPA, 1996. A Citizen's Guide to Phytoremediation, Technology Fact Sheet, EPA NCEPI, EPA/542/F-96/014. EPA, 1996. Recent Developments for In Situ Treatment of Metal Contaminated Soils, EPA/542/R-96/008. Schnoor, J.L., L.A. Licht, S.C. McCutcheon, N.L. Wolfe, and L.H. Carreira. 1995. "Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants," Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:318A-323A. USAEC, 1997. "Phytoremediation of Lead" in Innovative Technology Demonstration, Evaluation and Transfer Activities, FY 96 Annual Report, Report No. SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-97013, pp. 89-92. U.S. DOE, 1995. "Bioremediation of High Explosives by Plants," in Technology Catalogue, Second Edition, Office of Environmental Management Office of Technology Development, DOE/EM-0235, pp. 169-172. A comprehensive list of 850 references on phytoremediation are available at Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) Phytoremediation Action Team Web Site. Click to access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site Information:
Points of Contact:
Technology Specific Web Sites:
Vendor Information:
A list of vendors offering In Situ Biological Soil Treatment is available from EPA REACH IT which combines information from three established EPA databases, the Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT), the Vendor Field Analytical and Characterization Technologies System (Vendor FACTS), and the Innovative Treatment Technologies (ITT), to give users access to comprehensive information about treatment and characterization technologies and their applications. Health and Safety:
To be added
|
Notice | |
Foreword | |
Report Documentation Page | |
Acknowledgement | |
Objectives | |
Background | |
How to use this document | |
Natural Resources | |
Cautionary Notes | |
Online Survey |
Presumptive Remedies | |
Data Requirements | |
Nonhalogenated VOCs | |
Halogenated VOCs | |
Nonhalogenated SVOCs | |
Halogenated SVOCs | |
Fuels | |
Inorganics | |
Radionuclides | |
Explosives |
Soil,Sed.,Bedrock & Sludge | |
In Situ Biological | |
In Situ Phys/Chem | |
In Situ Thermal | |
Ex Situ Biological | |
Ex Situ Phys/Chem | |
Ex Situ Thermal | |
Containment | |
Other Treatment | |
Ground,Surf. H2O,Leachate | |
In Situ Biological | |
In Situ Phys/Chem | |
Ex Situ Biological | |
Ex Situ Phys/Chem | |
Containment | |
Off Gas & Air Emissions | |
Biofiltration | |
High Energy Destruction | |
Membrane Separation | |
Oxidation | |
Scrubbers | |
Carbon Adsorption |
Document Sources | |
Listing by Author | |
Listing of Websites |
A. Vendors | |
B. Site Projects | |
C. Federal Databases | |
D. Factors Affecting Treat. | |
E. Source Documents | |
F. Synonyms |
Site Map | |
Screening Matrix | |
Synonym List | |
Search | |
Contact Us | |
Disclaimer, Privacy, and Security Notice |
Soil,Sed.,Bedrock & Sludge | |
Gr. & Surf. H2O, Leachate | |
Air Emissions/Off-Gases |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Techs for Air Emissions | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Techs for Air Emissions | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Techs for Air Emissions | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Biological Techs | |
Thermal Techs | |
Other Techs | |
Common Techs | |
Treatment Train |
Bioventing | |
Enhanced Bioremediation | |
Phytoremediation |
Chemical Oxidation | |
Electrokinetic Sep. | |
Fracturing | |
Soil Flushing | |
Soil Vapor Extraction | |
Solidification/Stabilization |
Thermal Treatment |
Biopiles | |
Composting | |
Landfarming | |
Slurry Phase |
Chemical Extraction | |
Chemical RedOx | |
Dehalogenation | |
Separation | |
Soil Washing | |
Solidification/Stabilization |
Hot Gas Decon. | |
Incineration | |
OB/OD | |
Pyrolysis | |
Thermal Desorption |
Landfill Cap | |
Landfill Cap Enhancements |
Off-Site Disposal |
Enhanced Biodegradation | |
Natural Attenuation | |
Phytoremediation |
Air Sparging | |
Bioslurping | |
Chemical Oxidation | |
Directional Wells | |
Dual Phase Extraction | |
Thermal Treatment | |
Hydrofracturing | |
Air Stripping | |
Treatment Walls |
Bioreactors | |
Constructed Wetlands |
Adsorption/Absorption | |
Adv. Oxidation Processes | |
Air Stripping | |
GAC | |
Ground Water Pumping | |
Ion Exchange | |
Prec./Coag./Flocc. | |
Separation | |
Sprinkler Irrigation |
Physical Barriers | |
Deep Well Injection |