As of July 2020, the content of this old version has been replaced with a new version. |
Description | Synonyms | Applicability | Limitations | Site Information | Points of Contact | |
Data Needs | Performance | Cost | References | Vendor Info. | Health & Safety |
|
|
Description: Figure 4-41:Typical Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) Bioreactors degrade contaminants in water with microorganisms through attached or suspended biological systems. In suspended growth systems, such as activated sludge, fluidized beds, or sequencing batch reactors, contaminated ground water is circulated in an aeration basin where a microbial population aerobically degrades organic matter and produces CO2, H2O, and new cells. The cells form a sludge, which is settled out in a clarifier, and is either recycled to the aeration basin or disposed. In attached growth systems, such as upflow fixed film bioreactors, rotating biological contactors (RBCs), and trickling filters, microorganisms are established on an inert support matrix to aerobically degrade water contaminants. One promising methodology includes the use of active supports (such as activated carbon, which adsorbs the contaminant and slowly releases it to the microorganisms for degradation). The microbial population may be derived either from the contaminant source or from an inoculum of organisms specific to a contaminant. Other applications include wetland ecosystems and column reactors. Nutrients are often added to the bioreactors to support the growth of microorganisms. Bioreactors are a long-term technology. The process may take up to several years. Another aerating wastewater treatment is the trickling filter. The trickling filter consists of a bed of highly permeable media, a water distributor, and an underdrain system. Wastewater is distributed over the top of the filter bed through which wastewater is trickled. The organic contaminants in wastewater are degraded by the microorganisms attached to the filter medium. The filter media may be rocks, plastic, or wood. The filter bed is normally round with depth varying from 3 to 8 ft (0.9 to 0.5m) and average 6 ft (1.8m). As wastewater flows over the solid filter media, it is aerated and the organic contaminants are degraded by the microorganisms attached to the media surface. The underdrain system is used to collect the treated water and any biomass detached from the filter media. It is also important as a porous structure through which air can circulate. The duration of operation and maintenance of sprinkler irrigation depends on the amount of time needed to capture and treat the contaminated waste; monitoring of treated water; and monitoring of potential metal accumulation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synonyms: Rotating Biological Reactor; Rotating Biological Contactors (RBC).DSERTS Code: F18 (Bioreactors - Ex Situ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applicability: Bioreactors are used primarily to treat SVOCs, fuel hydrocarbons, and any biodegradable organic material. The process may be less effective for some pesticides. Successful pilot-scale field studies have been conducted on some halogenated compounds, such as PCP, chlorobenzene and dichloro-benzene isomers. Bioreactors with cometabolites are used to treat PCBs, halogenated VOCs, and SVOCs in extracted ground water. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limitations: The following factors may limit the applicability and effectiveness of the process:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Needs: A detailed discussion of these data elements is provided in Subsection 2.2.2 (Data Requirements for Ground Water, Surface Water, and Leachate).Data requirements include contaminants and their concentrations, pH, presence of compounds toxic to microorganisms, contaminant biodegradability, BOD5, COD, suspended solids, flow rate, temperature, and nutrient concentrations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Data: This is a well developed technology that has been used for many decades in the treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater. However, only in the past decade, studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of bioreactors in treating ground water and leachate from hazardous waste sites. Bioreactor equipment and materials are readily available. As with other pump-and-treat technologies, time needed to clean up is dependent upon subsurface conditions and the rate of desorption of contaminants from subsurface materials.Startup time can be slow if organisms need to be acclimated to the wastes; however, the existence of cultures that have been previously adapted to specific hazardous wastes can decrease startup and detention times. DOE has demonstrated another biological process, biological destruction of tank waste (BDTW), on the laboratory scale. This process is a separation and volume-reduction process for supernatant and sluiced salt cake waste from underground storage tanks. These wastes are usually composed of various radionuclides and toxic metals concentrated in a nitrate salt solution. The bacteria act as metal and radionuclide adsorbers and also as denitrification catalysts that reproduce themselves at ambient temperature and pressure. Some degradation of organic contaminants may also occur during the process. The field demonstration bioreactor tank size is about 100 cubic meters, which corresponds to a waste treatment rate of 2 gpm, sufficient to treat a 1-million gallon tank in 1 year. At the 2-gpm size, the BDTW system is transportable. The current bioreactor is able to process salt solutions having nitrate concentrations up to 300,000 ppm. The maximum salt tolerance is being explored. Power usage is estimated at 20 kW for pumping and agitation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost: The key cost driver information and cost analysis was developed using the 2006 version of the Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements (RACER) software. Key Cost Drivers · Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) o The COD a given waste exerts is the primary cost driver. · pH Adjustment o The secondary cost driver is the amount of acid/base required to neutralize the pH of the waste stream. Cost Analysis The following table represents estimated costs (by common unit of measure) to apply bioreactor technology at sites of varying size and complexity. A more detailed cost estimate table which includes specific site characteristics and significant cost elements that contributed to the final costs can be viewed by clicking on the link below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References: Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field Scale Demonstration Project in North America, 2nd Edition Groundwater Cleanup: Overview of Operating Experience at 28 Sites, September 1999, EPA 542-R-99-006, Abstracts
of Remediation Case Studies, Volume 4, June, 2000, EPA
542-R-00-006 DOE, 1994. Technology Catalogue, First Edition. February. EPA, 1980. Innovative and Alternative Technology Assessment Manual, EPA, Office of Water Program Operations, EPA/430/9-78/009. EPA, 1984. Design Information on Rotating Biological Contactors, EPA/600/2-84/106. EPA, 1987. Rotating Biological Contactors: U.S. Overview, EPA/600/D-87/023. EPA, 1991. BioTrol - Biotreatment of Groundwater, EPA RREL, series includes Technology Evaluation, EPA/540/5-91/001, PB92-110048; Applications Analysis, EPA/540/A5-91/001; Technology Demonstration Summary, EPA/540/S5-91/001; and Demonstration Bulletin, EPA/540/M5-91/001. EPA, 1993. BioTrol, Inc. - Methanotrophic Bioreactor System, EPA RREL, series includes Emerging Technology Bulletin, EPA/540/F-93/506; Emerging Technology Summary, EPA/540/SR-93/505; and Journal Article, AWMA, Vol. 43, No. 11, November 1993. Opatken, E.J., H.K. Howard, and J.J. Bond, 1987. "Biological Treatment of Hazardous Aqueous Wastes", EPA Report EPA/600/D-87/184. Opatken, E.J., H.K. Howard, and J.J. Bond, 1989. "Biological Treatment of Leachate from a Superfund Site," Environmental Progress, Vol. 8, No. 1. Stinson, M., H. Skovronek, and T. Chresand, 1992. "EPA SITE Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous Treatment System," Journal of the Air Waste Management Association, Vol. 41, No. 2, p. 228. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site Information:
Points of Contact:
Technology Specific Web Site:
Vendor Information:
A list of vendors offering Ex Situ Biological Water Treatment is available from EPA REACH IT which combines information from three established EPA databases, the Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT), the Vendor Field Analytical and Characterization Technologies System (Vendor FACTS), and the Innovative Treatment Technologies (ITT), to give users access to comprehensive information about treatment and characterization technologies and their applications. Health and Safety:
|
Notice | |
Foreword | |
Report Documentation Page | |
Acknowledgement | |
Objectives | |
Background | |
How to use this document | |
Natural Resources | |
Cautionary Notes | |
Online Survey |
Presumptive Remedies | |
Data Requirements | |
Nonhalogenated VOCs | |
Halogenated VOCs | |
Nonhalogenated SVOCs | |
Halogenated SVOCs | |
Fuels | |
Inorganics | |
Radionuclides | |
Explosives |
Soil,Sed.,Bedrock & Sludge | |
In Situ Biological | |
In Situ Phys/Chem | |
In Situ Thermal | |
Ex Situ Biological | |
Ex Situ Phys/Chem | |
Ex Situ Thermal | |
Containment | |
Other Treatment | |
Ground,Surf. H2O,Leachate | |
In Situ Biological | |
In Situ Phys/Chem | |
Ex Situ Biological | |
Ex Situ Phys/Chem | |
Containment | |
Off Gas & Air Emissions | |
Biofiltration | |
High Energy Destruction | |
Membrane Separation | |
Oxidation | |
Scrubbers | |
Carbon Adsorption |
Document Sources | |
Listing by Author | |
Listing of Websites |
A. Vendors | |
B. Site Projects | |
C. Federal Databases | |
D. Factors Affecting Treat. | |
E. Source Documents | |
F. Synonyms |
Site Map | |
Screening Matrix | |
Synonym List | |
Search | |
Contact Us | |
Disclaimer, Privacy, and Security Notice |
Soil,Sed.,Bedrock & Sludge | |
Gr. & Surf. H2O, Leachate | |
Air Emissions/Off-Gases |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Techs for Air Emissions | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Techs for Air Emissions | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Techs for Air Emissions | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Techs for H2O | |
Treatment Train |
Properties & Behavior | |
Techs for Soil | |
Biological Techs | |
Thermal Techs | |
Other Techs | |
Common Techs | |
Treatment Train |
Bioventing | |
Enhanced Bioremediation | |
Phytoremediation |
Chemical Oxidation | |
Electrokinetic Sep. | |
Fracturing | |
Soil Flushing | |
Soil Vapor Extraction | |
Solidification/Stabilization |
Thermal Treatment |
Biopiles | |
Composting | |
Landfarming | |
Slurry Phase |
Chemical Extraction | |
Chemical RedOx | |
Dehalogenation | |
Separation | |
Soil Washing | |
Solidification/Stabilization |
Hot Gas Decon. | |
Incineration | |
OB/OD | |
Pyrolysis | |
Thermal Desorption |
Landfill Cap | |
Landfill Cap Enhancements |
Off-Site Disposal |
Enhanced Biodegradation | |
Natural Attenuation | |
Phytoremediation |
Air Sparging | |
Bioslurping | |
Chemical Oxidation | |
Directional Wells | |
Dual Phase Extraction | |
Thermal Treatment | |
Hydrofracturing | |
Air Stripping | |
Treatment Walls |
Bioreactors | |
Constructed Wetlands |
Adsorption/Absorption | |
Adv. Oxidation Processes | |
Air Stripping | |
GAC | |
Ground Water Pumping | |
Ion Exchange | |
Prec./Coag./Flocc. | |
Separation | |
Sprinkler Irrigation |
Physical Barriers | |
Deep Well Injection |